Obamacare Supreme Court Case Impact on You and NC, Thursday, 5/14 at Skyland FD

Asheville Tea Party Press Release  

Asheville Tea Party To Host John Locke Foundation's Expert on the Obamacare Tax  - King vs Burwell Supreme Court Case - at Skyland Fire Department,  7PM  on May 14th 

Contact Chair Jane Bilello 828 692 3117

The outcome of the United States Supreme Court case King vs Burwell, the Obamacare tax,  will have a major impact upon you and our state. Find out how from John Locke's Health and Human Services Analyst and expert, Katherine Restrepo who  will join Asheville Tea Party at 7PM on Thursday, May 14, 2015 at the Skyland Fire Department.  

Katherine Restrepo recently previewed the case for Forbes readers. In the article, she asks,      

"Should the court's final ruling in June deem that subsidy distribution in federal exchanges is illegal, what will this mean for North Carolina? If the court sides with the plaintiffs, Obamacare subsidies would end in states with no state-based health insurance exchange. The result for North Carolina could be "insurance upheaval."

 "Before joining the John Locke Foundation, Katherine interned at the Cato Institute under the direction of Michael F. Cannon, Director of Health Policy Studies. In Washington, D.C., she developed a strong interest in consumer-driven health care and repeal of anti-constitutional provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare)

Katherine graduated from McDaniel College with a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science and Spanish along with a minor in Communication. She is currently pursuing her master’s degree in health care administration at the University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health. ..."

Please join us on Thursday, May 14th at 7PM at Skyland Fire Department to take advantage of this opportunity to get the facts of  the King vs Burwell Supreme Court Case and the  consequences of the decision from an expert.  Presentation followed by an audience discussion and Q and A.

END

-----------------------------------

Katherine Restrepo Resume: http://www.johnlocke.org/research/bio/604

Katherine's latest article: 4/23/15:  Helping Patients By Taking on CON http://www.carolinajournal.com/daily_journal/index.html

See here  http://www.johnlocke.org/research/bio/604 and here http://www.johnlocke.org/research/author/604 for some of Katherine's extensive writing and research. 

 

-----------

JLF expert says Obamacare ruling will have major N.C. impact

Contact:

Katherine Restrepo

610-698-9653

 RALEIGH -- The federal Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, heads to the U.S. Supreme Court again on Wednesday. Justices will hear oral arguments in King v. Burwell, a case in which plaintiffs seek to have the health care law operate as written.


If the court sides with the plaintiffs, Obamacare subsidies would end in states with no state-based health insurance exchange. The result for North Carolina could be "insurance upheaval," according to Katherine Restrepo, John Locke Foundation Health and Human Services Policy Analyst. 

Restrepo recently previewed the case for Forbes readers. "Should the court's final ruling in June deem that subsidy distribution in federal exchanges is illegal, what will this mean for North Carolina?" Restrepo asks in her Forbes column.

"Since these subsidies are tied to the individual mandate along with the bipartisan-panned employer mandate, over 10,000 large employers, 2.5 million employees, and 400,000 individuals in the Tar Heel State could indeed be liberated from these penalties.

"Let me explain. In a state-based exchange -- where subsidies are legal -- if an employer with 50 or more full-time workers does not provide health insurance and one of the employees purchases an exchange plan on his own and qualifies for a subsidy, then the employer is hit with a penalty. Receiving a subsidy triggers a tax on the employer. However, for federal exchange states the absence of subsidies would eliminate the law's tax on employers who do not provide health coverage for their workers.

"Outrage would also ensue," Restrepo adds. "No subsidies mean that millions of citizens would be exposed to the full cost of Obamacare health insurance premiums."

The Republican congressional majority would have more opportunities to negotiate with President Obama on this "unworkable law," Restrepo said. 

"Medical care can certainly be more affordable with fewer of the taxes and regulatory requirements Obamacare currently imposes," she said. "And there are ways that insurance companies can compete for individuals with pre-existing conditions by offering portable, secure, guaranteed renewable policies.

"A popular proposal co-sponsored by our very own U.S. Sen. Richard Burr advises the repeal of all 20 Obamacare taxes and fees that economically burden employers, insurance companies, medical device companies, individuals, and the like. Instead, it proposes to liberalize the exchanges (liberalization in the good sense) so that insurers can be more flexible with the products they offer."

For more information, please contact Katherine Restrepo at (610) 698-9653 orkrestrepo@johnlocke.org. To arrange an interview, contact Mitch Kokai at (919) 306-8736 ormkokai@johnlocke.org.